Grudge Hoarders and Mass Murder
Frustration accrual and social collapse became a pressure cooker.
Posted Jun 09, 2020
On Saturday, April 18, 2020, Gabriel Wortman started killing neighbors in the rural community of Portapique, Nova Scotia. Police located 13 shooting victims inside and around several burning homes, but Wortman had left the area.
The search led to multiple sites where nine others were killed. After 13 hours, police located Wortman in a gas station. An armed confrontation resulted in his death. This week, Canadian news offered statements about Wortman’s character and motive, although a full review is still ongoing.
Canadian authorities had warned about Wortman’s potential risk for violence nine years ago, when an acquaintance heard him threaten to kill a cop. Several experts now call him an “injustice collector,” a person who holds long-term grudges and develops the notion he must punish any perceived offense. The phrase has been used to characterize American mass murderers as well. Christopher Harper-Mercer, who killed nine at Umpqua Community College in Oregon in 2015, was labeled a "wound collector." So was Christopher Dorner in 2013.
Michael Arntfield, a professor and criminologist at Western University in London, Ontario, told Canadian reporters that injustice collectors are disproportionately middle-aged males who amass an inventory of perceived slights. "Injustice collectors have a negative or adversarial interpretation of every encounter," he said.
Personally, I think it's more accurate to call them hoarders than collectors. They fully internalize grievances to the point where they find both solace and an identity in their long lists. They develop a pathological need to control others (like hoarders with objects), and the more grudges they accumulate, the more unforgiving they become and the more insulated they feel from the world’s uncertainties. Their fantasies feature them "winning” against those who’ve done them wrong, shored up with righteous justifications for whatever they decide to do.
Grudge hoarders view perceived affronts as a show of disrespect. Couple this with an attitude of narcissistic entitlement, and you have a simmering pot of resentment, ready to boil over into rage. Getting armed for action is but a short step away.
People who live with grudge hoarders who turn violent are often their first targets. Wortman’s common-law wife was among the earliest victims. He assaulted her when they were arguing after attending a party. In handcuffs, she escaped. Wortman set the house on fire and went back to the party to shoot people, killing seven. He proceeded to other homes, setting fires and shooting more residents. Emergency calls brought the police, who discovered 13 dead and one wounded.
Early the next morning, Wortman’s wife found a phone to call 911. She described his fake police uniform and refurbished police cruiser (he had four). By then, he’d burned houses in a town twenty-three miles away and killed more people. A male police officer he’d shot survived, but a female officer was killed. Wortman then hijacked an SUV, killing the driver, to continue to the home of a female friend, whom he killed. He changed out of his uniform and stole her car. Police put out updated BOLOs, finally bringing him down.
With 22 dead and three injured, this murder spree rates as Canada’s worst to date.
Spree killers are not all alike, although they’ve often been characterized as such. For a book, Spree Killers, former FBI profiler Mark Safarik and I collected 359 spree cases from 43 countries and identified five primary motivational categories: Anger/Revenge, Mission, Desperation, Mental Illness, and Robbery/Thrill. Each had subcategories.
In the Anger/Revenge category, spree killers might 1) target all of their victims, 2) target some and also kill randomly, or 3) kill entirely randomly or opportunistically. In other words, some spree killers who have a grudge or seek revenge know exactly who they want to kill, while others have a more generalized need to act out or punish. The Anger/Revenge category represents 30% of the spree cases in our database. In this study, 34 of 111 anger/revenge cases involved the subcategory that includes Wortman – a mix of targeted and random murders.
Few people were surprised by Wortman's violence. The 51-year-old was known as a paranoid, controlling bully. He’d once been ordered into anger management counseling, but it did little good. Wortman apparently had ambitions to become a police officer, but later expressed a wish to harm police. Like other anger-motivated spree and mass killers, Wortman had trouble accepting life’s frustrations. A denturist by trade, he'd recently been forced by the pandemic to close his practices for an unspecified period of time. This situation only magnified the emotional force of other grievances.
Wortman had lost a legal battle with his uncle in 2015 over property in Portapique. This home was among those Wortman burned, killing the current owner (not the uncle). Among his other targets were those with whom he'd had issues. A spokesperson for the RCMP said the killer's victims fell into one of three categories. "Some recipients of his wrath of violence were targeted for perceived injustices of the past, others were reactive targets of his rage and others were random targets.”
His wife survived, but over the years she'd experienced Wortman's assaults. In Spree Killers, Safarik and I cite studies that include domestic violence as a precursor to other types of future violence, especially if the person strangles his partner. Reportedly, Wortman was known for assaulting his wife, was obsessed with police, and had a significant stash of illegal firearms – all factors that show up in violence prediction assessments. As a grudge hoarder, he continually amassed negative emotional energy but his rigid personality blocked any way to vent it. Armed and dangerous, with further frustrations from COVID-19 restrictions, he launched a fatal rampage.
References
Safarik, M. & Ramsland, K. (2019). Spree killers: Practical classification for law enforcement and criminology. CRC.
Grudge Hoarder
I'm worse than a Grudge Hoarder. I'm a Nihilist who sings of the burning of Rome.
Holding grudges
Holding grudges is a big trait of mass shooters and always has been.
Howard Unruh and James Huberty are the most obvious.
Howard Unruh had a list, a diary of all his grudges against people. James Huberty said he "always pay my debts." and 100% believed in violent retaliation. His believed in it as well, saying "My father was raised in Kentucky and down there we take care of things our selves. You beat up my kid, I'll beat up your kid. Tit for tat, you kill my dog then I'm definitely gonna kill your cat."
Joseph Wesbecker who was totally screwed over by his printing plant he worked for, he had a hit list of bosses to kill. He never killed them. Instead he just shot and killed coworkers...what I find most interesting is what he originally wanted to do and what he did. He originally wanted to bomb the plant and during the massacre he would shoot all around the plant, in the break room he shot the water line [air conditioner] and a vending machine. Reminds me of Eric and Dylan destroying Columbine high school during their massacre. Which makes me think of a quote by Brooke's Brown's father ""They went to school to kill people. They didn't go shoot up the police station, they didnt go to the public library and that's because they hated this school. They hated the injustice of this school. They hated the environment."
What I also find interesting is the fact that Joseph Wesbecker's massacre resulted in a lawsuit against prozac. The case they made against prozac was laughable. At no point during the trial did they even come to proving prozac caused Wesbecker to commit the mass shooting. After the trial, all the people who sued even admitted it had nothing to do with prozac and blamed the horrible working conditions at the plant. So they just wanted the money. Wesbecker had been planning the massacre for literally months and had only taken prozac for like 2 or 3 days before the massacre.
Can't help but also think of Eric Harris.
In one documentary a child psychiatrist tries to imply that the anti depressants he took might of caused the violent thoughts and behavior. She even says "they realized it was BECAUSE of the medication." That is complete bullsh*t! In fact Eric Harris before he even went to therapy had signed a list of problems he was having, so the psychiatrist would know what to talk about once he actually got to the office and spoke with her. On his list of problems he listed "suicidal and homicidal" thoughts. So he had been having obsessive suicidal and homicidal ideation for about a year before ever taking any anti depressants and still people fall for this simplistic easy excuse "oh yeah, it was the drugs fault." not that he was a psychopath and people want to try and downplay that and argue "but he had feelings. He loved animals." Yeah, there are degrees [levels] of psychopathy and many well known psychopaths were animal lovers. Gerald Gallego was an animal lover and a total psychopathic killer and rapist. Carl Panzram was a psychopath and felt bad about the "few animals" he killed when he was younger. Keith Jesperson killed cats and hated cats but took care of a pet raven with a broken wing and nursed it back to health when his brother killed it he went into a rage and destroyed his brother's room. William Bonin, he had zero empathy for the victims he raped, tortured, and killed. He would laugh and smile about it, but he said "I have more empathy for an animal then a human being." I guess they aren't all psychopaths then?" Yeah, some psychopaths or sociopaths love animals but have zero empathy or emotion for their fellow human beings. Shows how much those people know about psychopathy.
This is another reason why I hate this "no notoriety" because the majority of the time, mass shootings are REVENGE killings. They hold grudges....what the F*CK does that have to do with "notoriety"?????? NOTHING. They would of done it anyway, I think that is blatantly obvious.
Also the "harm" "oh this encourages and or causes more violence." If you really cared then, then you wouldn't report race issues. You wouldn't report ANYTHING that "might cause or inspire violence." Let's take this George Floyde murder case.
Two scumbag cops coldly murder a black guy and thousands of citizens take to the streets to protest...DURING A PANDEMIC!!!!!! This also resulted in rioting and looting. Stores of all kinds burned down. This also resulted in more scumbag cops and military harming people and helping to spread coronavirus. So we are talking about probably hundreds of more deaths and even more financial devastation due to the arson to businesses.
Or take Ferguson, who was also murdered by scumbag cops.
Wasn't there a mass shooter who shot police officers BECAUSE of that murder? Also, what about Dylan Roof? He said he went down the rabbit hole of the alt right, KKK, etc because of all the publicity about Tryvon Martin, and other black mass shooters cited Dylan Roof's massacre as a reason for their massacre.
If they really f*cking cared, why the f*ck are they talking about as inflammatory as race issues on the news?! "if we show this, people will riot/protest/mass arson/kill cops/kill protesters." etc....but no, no, ONLY use that line of stupid idiotic logic with "no notoriety". They don't believe it, they are just using it as a smoke screen to not get the hate for their sensationalism.
"58 dead, 150 people injured. The worse massacre in American history" on air ad nausum "oh but I'm in no way trying to glorify. I'm not even saying his name." and as James Fox told this smoke screen journalist "The name isn't the problem."
So basically...yeah, I can sensationalist it as much as possible. I can OBSESSIVELY plaster it on MAINSTREAM TV all day, every day for months "but I didn't say his name." so I'm off the hook. Great, great job "no notoriety" Just forget the 24/7 news cycle of obsessive reporting and it's been proven that 24/7 reporting has caused harm to society, where it be the satanic panic [the media of all sorts PUSHING a narrative] out right supporting an unjust war, supporting violations to the U.S constitution such as the "Patriot act" and so forth, or "stranger danger." It even has a name. It's called the Mean world syndrome.
"Mean world syndrome asserts that viewers who are exposed to violence-related content can experience increased fear, anxiety, pessimism and heightened state of alert in response to perceived threats.[2][3] This is because media (namely television) consumed by viewers has the power to directly influence and inform their attitudes, beliefs and opinions about the world."
but forget that. Just ignore that. "no notoriety" that's it. Let's focus on not naming killers because that will somehow name make people commit mass murder even though ALL EVIDENCE shows they would of done it ANYWAY?!?!?!
I am so sick of this stupidity.
Grudge Holders
Don't get mad.... GET EVEN!
Post Comment